About Me

Name: HNAV
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Search

HILL-ARIOUS !

Posted by HNAV on Tuesday, January 30, 2007 11:40:19 PM

SUPER DIDDOS BUMP:

She's Lying: Hillary '07 vs. Hillary '03

'RUSH: Yay! This is an outright lie. This is a total mischaracterization. We all know why. It is designed to get her over the hump, so to speak, of this problem that she has, that she voted for the war.'

Hillary boldly lies to all again...
Will the Libs buy it once more?

The mighty Sweetness & Light shows the Cult of Code Pink:


Such fun, a few weeks before Operation of Iraqi Freedom.

Ironic, to see Hillary's strident support to remove Saddam:
'With respect to whose responsibility it is to disarm Saddam Hussein. I just do not believe that given the attitudes of many people in the world community today that there would be a willingness to take on very difficult problems were it not for the United States leadership.'

'Be for it, before you are against it...'

Hillary now predictably lies, about her vote to authorize force:
'CBS: "You were among those who advocated going to war in Iraq...

Clinton [indulging in some creative revisionism]: "I did not advocate that. I voted to give the president authority to have the United States congress behind him when he went to the U.N. To put inspectors back in to figure out what Saddam Hussein had. That would not have been the choice, in my opinion, that we should have pursued at that time. But I thought it was reasonable to give him that authority."'

The unethical Clintons never change.

Ms. Rodham's belly may have grown larger, along with her cravings for power, but she will still 'say anything' to try to further herself.

Even if it means abandoning millions in Iraq fighting for freedom...

Such wimpy leadership, blowing with the wacko winds.


The Chattering Hillary Doll!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ahmadinejad Speaks

Posted by HNAV on Tuesday, January 23, 2007 10:42:23 PM

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

COMPLETELY MINDLESS

Posted by HNAV on Friday, January 19, 2007 12:02:36 PM

'Do you personally want the Iraq plan President
Bush announced last week to succeed?'

Here are the results:
Overall: 63% Yes 22% No 15% Don’t Know
Democrats: 51% Yes 34% No 15% Don’t Know
Republicans: 79% Yes 11% No 10% Don’t Know
Independents 63% Yes 19% No 17% Don’t Know

'Even though we have some 150,000 troops in harm’s way and we universally profess to “support the troops,” over 1/3 of our society either wants them to fail or doesn’t know if they want them to succeed. Even more chilling are the results regarding our currently dominant political party. 49% of Democrats either want us to lose in Iraq or “don’t know” if they want us to succeed.'

Can you imagine anyone considering such a poll in 1942?

Sickening to consider...
It is simply very sad.

Isn't the 'drive by' MSM doing such a wonderful job?

These foolish Democrat Partisans have manipulated the Liberation of the Oppressed, and the battle against Radical Muslim Tyrants, into something some wish to resent.

All because of their Liberal bigotry for a Republican President, and an unethical greed for power.

Perhaps, a form of insanity has affected all sides of the spectrum. Now some are engaged in a form of self serving vanity, hoping to see this President, or the USA, suffer a defeat.

Too blind to see the horrid consequences, of such a potential tragedy.

Did they believe Nancy Pelosi's vivid deceit?
'The "Best Spin of the Year": Democrats saying Iraq is not part of the war on terror. They sold this idea, which allowed them to be against the war in Iraq before the war on terror. In truth, Iraq is part of the war on terror.'

Maybe the bitter are so jaded, with disappointment in life, it is clouding their judgment.

But it only reminds everyone, how easy it is for human beings, to lose context of the brutal alternatives.

Al Qaeda must be thrilled.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SAY ANYTHING

Posted by HNAV on Thursday, January 18, 2007 12:06:49 PM


Hillary Rodham offered more of the old song and dance today...

Another Clintonian version of the Kerry Flop, weakly calling for the USA to 'run away', in a slightly measured manner:
'The United States should cap the number of troops in Iraq, while increasing American forces in Afghanistan, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said Wednesday.'

What is most amusing, her simplistic effort, did not seem to make any real waves. Perhaps when you flip & flop repeatedly, you reduce the your ability to make a splash.

The tired effort in self interst today, created far less buzz, than Sen. Barack Obama did the day before. Ms. Rodham's many appearances on various TV Stations, didn't compare to the chatter created by Barack Hussein Jr's website video. In fact, most coverage of Sen. Clinton's blatant attempt to appease Liberal Democrats today, included even more references to Sen. Obama.

The mighty NB has the video here:
Here's Hillary's idea of diplomacy: bend to her will, or she'll put your life in danger. And that's how she treats our allies.

"I [suggest] putting leverage on them and saying 'you know what, we provide security for the members of this government, we're cutting funding for that.'"

The ugly display is no surprise...

What does Hillary Rodham mean by 'redeploy' anyhow?

Does Mrs. Clinton want the mighty US Armed Forces, to help her Nationalize Health Care in the United States?

It isn't new, watching those in the MSM, fail to seriously consider the basis of Hillary's conjecture. She has profited on a mythic image, created by biased Media Elites, (just as they managed the perception of Bill Clinton, for their own political interests).

Perhaps most interesting, it seems Hillary will be facing a sincere primary challenge, something she personally has never encountered.

'Hillary Clinton will do what she and her husband have always done. When they speak of the politics of personal destruction, they aren't really complaining of how they're being treated. Psychologists call this "projection." When they speak of it, the Clintons are talking about another fundamental element of their politics.'

Or is the Obama hype, Edwards interest, Biden ambition, Dodd curiosity, merely a strategic Democrat plan of varied degrees?

We shall see...

Regardless, the Code Pinkos are driving the Democrat Party.

When Cindy speaks, Hillary and Company, listen...

Millions of lives in the Middle East, the Future of the Free World, are of no relevance when it comes to the personal ambition of Hillary Rodham Clinton or the Democrat Party.

Remember when Democrats danced, in the other direction?
Sen. Clinton: "I Can Support The President, I Can Support An Action Against Saddam Hussein Because I Think It's In The Long-Term Interests Of Our National Security…" ('Meet The Press' 9/15/02)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"HERE I STAND"

Posted by HNAV on Sunday, January 14, 2007 1:58:46 PM


The mighty ANCHORESS:
Supporting the war is not about “giving Bush a win” and decrying it is not about “giving Bush a loss.” It’s about all of us.

'With only two alternatives on the table - fight or flight - the debate really comes down to questions of context. One is geopolitical: Just how important is this war beyond Iraq? Another is political in the domestic sense: Is this just George W. Bush’s war, or is it a war in which the whole nation has a stake?'

If we go down, we all go down together, the President will not “fail” in a vacuum...

What is Our Future?

Will the United States of America, continue to lead in this World, bringing freedom, hope, opportunity to Millions, or will we cede this World into darkness?

The answer to this battle remains at Home, as the struggle against the unethical 'self interest for personal gain', continues to provide a slanted view of the challenges facing the Free World.

Partisans suppporting the Democrat Party, dominating the MSM, are deeply blinded by their bigotry against Conservatives. The ugly manipulation is truly shameful.

How can a Nation determine sound policy for it's Future, as well as, wisely aid others around the Globe, when it isn't being provided objective information?

"It's a demoralizing and revolting spectacle"

We must be strong.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sabotage !

Posted by HNAV on Thursday, January 11, 2007 1:33:23 PM

'Pelosi Says Trying To Save Iraq Sends Wrong Signal'

If you are oppressed by a Monstrous Dictator, or faced with Radical Muslim Militants blowing themselves up in your backyard, you better pray the Democrat Party does not control the USA.

It is no wonder, the Terrorists were openly advocating for Democrats in US elections...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

MEMORIES

Posted by HNAV on Wednesday, January 10, 2007 12:46:35 AM



Now, the same mindless dupes are in control of Congress.

And even Ms. Rodham wants to return to the White House.

Up is down, left is right, backwards is forwards...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

FREE CUBA

Posted by HNAV on Tuesday, January 09, 2007 2:37:38 PM

The amazing Sweetness & Light:

'Wives Of Castro’s Prisoners Beg Cindy Sheehan For Help'

Oh my, the sad irony...

The Cindy-Confused-Code-Pink Folly is visiting Cuba, trying to free Radical Islamic Terrorists, and the truly oppressed Prisoners of Castro's Cuba, are now stealing the show.

The big question remains, who is funding Cindy and Friends?

Chavez, Gore, Pelosi?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'THE PELOSI PERIL'

Posted by HNAV on Tuesday, January 09, 2007 11:02:43 AM

"Is history to repeat on the Democrats' watch? And how typical of the party to threaten to cut the legs out from under the U.S. military effort.

It's what it did in Vietnam more than 30 years ago:

* First, the Democratic-controlled Congress voted to end all U.S. military activities there by a set deadline.

* Then it cut off all military funding to South Vietnam.

Emboldened by these moves, North Vietnam invaded the South; President Gerald Ford pleaded for an emergency infusion of military and humanitarian aid, but Democrats voted it down.

Weeks later, Saigon fell, the agony of the Boat People began - and Cambodia's Pol Pot, waiting in the wings, made his move.

Now Pelosi & Co. are flirting with a repeat of that kind of disaster.

They maintain that the only avenue open to the United States in Iraq is a political solution - once that's reached, they claim, internal security will follow.

In fact, the truth is just the opposite.

As Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) notes on the opposite page, "security is the precondition for political progress and economic development."

Will that guarantee peace? No. But as Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Conn.) added: "Our troops believe they can win, and that's important."

The Democrats are so busy running away from a war they initially approved that they're willing - even eager, perhaps - to facilitate an American defeat."

The Democrat Party is not concerned with sound policy, the best interest for the Free World, or the formerly oppressed Iraqi People.  Democrats, coupled with the unethical MSM partisans, are only interested in destroying Republicans and Conservatives.  Misguided Liberal greed for power continues...


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE BIG LIE

Posted by HNAV on Sunday, January 07, 2007 2:54:02 PM

'BARNES: All right. The "Best Spin of the Year": Democrats saying Iraq is not part of the war on terror. They sold this idea, which allowed them to be against the war in Iraq before the war on terror. In truth, Iraq is part of the war on terror.

KONDRACKE: Well, the corollary what the Democrats say is that if we lose in Iraq, we're not going to lose in the war on terror. Some Democratic president may rue the day that they made that point, because they go together.'

As the the Democrats take control of the House, it is important to remember how they got there. Constant undermining for a policy the vast Majority of the elected Democrats voted to endorse, aided by an unethical MSM who promoted endless deceit.

"No matter how many times the president wants to say it, the war in Iraq is not the war on terror..."

The liberals were lead by Nancy 'Plastic' Pelosi, who boldly lied to the American Public about the battle in Iraq. Of course, Liberal Democrats have been dishonest about everything, including this fine economy. But the primary manipulation regarding the GWOT, was the most damaging and regretful.

This became even more comical, as al Qaeda repeatedly reminded everyone, about their violent efforts in Iraq.

There is little doubt, the Liberals were aided by a number of misguided Americans, who lost sight of the big picture, this essential struggle against Radical Muslim Militants.

With 9-11 becoming a faint memory, a healthy economy, and several years of safety at Home, it became hard for those not paying attention, to see the sincere need for the sacrifice in Iraq.

Others, became obsessed with the local, abandoning the very President who led so bravely after 9-11. President Bush, a symbol of Liberal hatred for all Conservatives, became vilified by many seeking an impossible perfection. Ironically, in the end, many empowered the corrupt Liberal Agenda they actually oppose.

Certainly, a vast number of Democrat Partisans, actually believe Iraq has nothing to do with this Global War against Militant Radical Muslims. Could this incoming Speaker of the US House, the first Woman in this historic position, be this ignorant?

Regardless, to one's opinions about the need to remove a Monster named 'Saddam', Iraq is now central to the GWOT.

It was appparent, the Democrat Party and their Partisan Support in the MSM, cared little for the future of the formerly oppressed People of Iraq and Afghanistan. Sadly, the greed for power seems more important to Liberal Democrats, than the future of the Arab Region, and the security of the Free World.

This demeaning agenda for personal gain, became ironically offensive, as Anti-US forces began to mimic the expression of the Democrat Party. Eventually, it reached absurdity, seeing Terrorists around the World openly advocate for the election of Democrats.

In fact, some of these Militant Muslim Radicals, actually believed the Democrats regaining control of Congress was a victory for terror.

"The first is that you aren't the ones who won the midterm elections, nor are the Republicans the ones who lost. Rather, the Mujahideen - the Muslim Ummah's vanguard in Afghanistan and Iraq - are the ones who won, and the American forces and their Crusader allies are the ones who lost," - Ayman al Zawahri

We can only hope, these Terrorists are wrong again...

UPDATE: The mighty ANCHORESS contemplates the vivid deceit in our Political Environment (not to be missed):
"Lies, all lies, and bad, intelligence-insulting lies to boot. We put up with them. Well, let’s face it, maybe some of us are stupid enough, maleable enough or disinterested enough to make the easy lie so profitable a tool for modern politicians."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Is This Hillary's Plantation?

Posted by HNAV on Friday, January 05, 2007 12:01:33 AM



'Democrats To Start Without GOP Input'

"But instead of allowing Republicans to fully participate in deliberations, as promised after the Democratic victory in the Nov. 7 midterm elections, Democrats now say they will use House rules to prevent the opposition from offering alternative measures, assuring speedy passage of the bills and allowing their party to trumpet early victories"
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »